China · Kunming, Yunnan · March 1, 2014

The 2014 Kunming Railway Station Attack

Thirty-one people were killed and 141 injured during an attack at Kunming Railway Station. Chinese courts later convicted four defendants in cases that included intentional homicide and terrorism-related offenses; three death sentences were ultimately approved and carried out.

Editorial country artwork for China
Editorial note: this page describes the criminal judgments without generalizing responsibility to any ethnic, religious or regional community. It also omits tactical or instructional details about how the attack was carried out.
StatusSolved / adjudicated
CategoryMass murder / terrorism
LocationKunming Railway Station, Yunnan, China
DateMarch 1, 2014
Victims31 people killed; 141 injured
Final criminal outcomeThree death sentences carried out in 2015; one life sentence

The attack and the victims

On the evening of March 1, 2014, a group attacked people at Kunming Railway Station in Yunnan. The Supreme People's Court's later summary of the case records 31 people killed and 141 injured, including 40 people described as seriously injured.

Police confronted the attackers at the station. Several attackers died at the scene, while one woman was injured and captured. The later prosecution also included defendants accused of organizing the group before the station attack.

Investigation and prosecution

Authorities opened a terrorism and homicide investigation and prosecuted four defendants: Iskandar Ehet, Turgun Tohtunyaz, Hasayn Muhammad and Patigul Tohti. The prosecution's case did not assign identical roles to all four, and the final sentences reflected those differences.

According to the Supreme People's Procuratorate, the defendants were prosecuted for offenses including organizing and leading a terrorist organization, participation in a terrorist organization and intentional homicide. Crime by Region uses those legal labels as findings of the Chinese courts rather than as a basis for broader claims about communities or political identities.

Trial and sentences

On September 12, 2014, the Kunming Intermediate People's Court sentenced Iskandar Ehet, Turgun Tohtunyaz and Hasayn Muhammad to death and Patigul Tohti to life imprisonment. The first three were convicted of organizing or leading a terrorist organization and intentional homicide; Tohti received a different judgment based on her adjudicated role.

The defendants appealed. On October 31, 2014, the Yunnan High People's Court upheld the three death sentences and the life sentence.

Supreme People's Court review

Because death sentences require further judicial review, the cases went to the Supreme People's Court. The Court approved the three death sentences. On March 24, 2015, the Kunming Intermediate People's Court announced that the executions had been carried out following the Supreme People's Court's approval.

The life sentence imposed on Patigul Tohti remained distinct from the capital sentences. This page therefore does not flatten the four defendants into a single legal outcome.

What is legally established

The attack's death toll, the large number of injured victims and the four defendants' criminal judgments are documented in official court and procuratorate records. The appellate and sentence-review process also reached definitive outcomes for the sentences described above.

For that reason, the file is classified as Solved / Adjudicated. The classification refers to the criminal cases that reached judgment; it does not imply that every historical or political question surrounding the attack was judicially resolved.

Timeline

March 1, 2014: the attack at Kunming Railway Station kills 31 people and injures 141.

June 2014: prosecutors announce the indictment of four defendants.

September 12, 2014: the Kunming Intermediate People's Court imposes three death sentences and one life sentence.

October 31, 2014: the Yunnan High People's Court upholds the judgments on appeal.

March 24, 2015: after Supreme People's Court review and approval, the three death sentences are carried out.

Current status

The convictions and final sentences described above remain the documented adjudicated outcome located for this case. No later judicial decision overturning those judgments was found in this review.

Advertisement

Sources

Related China case files