This source-led archive begins with the 2005 Andijan killings. It separates agreed chronology from disputed casualty figures, official prosecutions from the unresolved conduct of security forces, and institutional findings from allegations.
A case appears here only when reliable records establish criminal responsibility through a credible final process.
Documented Uzbekistan cases without a full, independent and effective inquiry or reliable final accountability.
Security forces opened fire after an armed seizure and mass gathering in Andijan. The toll remains disputed, trials drew serious fair-process criticism, and international bodies still have not received the independent inquiry they requested.
Read the sourced case file →
Six car bombs killed 16 people and injured more than 100. Uzbekistan secured convictions, but torture allegations and serious fair-trial concerns leave the complete authorship contested.
Read the sourced case file →The archive answers separate questions about events, proceedings and accountability rather than treating them as one verdict.
Uzbekistan reported 187 deaths. International bodies and independent investigations have cited estimates in the hundreds. The archive presents the range and attribution instead of manufacturing precision.
People accused of organizing the unrest were convicted, but OSCE/ODIHR monitors raised serious fair-trial concerns. Those verdicts did not independently establish responsibility for security-force gunfire.
The imagery is symbolic and non-documentary. It does not reconstruct the shooting, invent a victim’s likeness or present an illustration as evidence.
The inaugural case has a substantial record across UN, OSCE and established human-rights sources.
Andijan belongs here because the central facts can be cross-checked while the uncertainties can be named precisely: the sequence before the crowd gathered, the use of lethal force, the incompatible casualty figures, the prosecutions that followed and the continuing absence of a full independent inquiry.
Future additions will require a distinct search intent, multiple reliable sources and a defensible procedural status. The number of pages is not treated as a measure of crime in Uzbekistan.
Direct answers on scope, status and editorial method.
Two verified case files are published: the 2005 Andijan killings and the 1999 Tashkent bombings.
Andijan lacks a full independent inquiry into the crowd killings. Tashkent produced convictions, but credible torture and fair-trial concerns leave the complete authorship and individual roles contested.
No. It records convictions and sentences, while distinguishing a judgment from independently reliable proof when the evidence is challenged as coerced.
Yes, when reliable sources support a distinct, substantive page without duplicating an existing case or overstating legal certainty.