How this Tunisia archive is classified
Both published files have adjudicated cores: courts convicted specific defendants for roles connected to the separate assassinations of Chokri Belaid and Mohamed Brahmi. The classifications remain bounded because outcomes differ by defendant, appeals and enforcement require precision, and public allegations about wider sponsorship are not automatically judicial findings.
Why are the cases separate?
Belaid was killed on February 6, 2013; Brahmi was killed on July 25, 2013. The victims, dates and proceedings are distinct even though investigators reported common weapons, suspects or militant networks.
What does “adjudicated” mean here?
It means Tunisian criminal courts imposed convictions. It does not mean that a death sentence was carried out, that every defendant received the same outcome or that every suspected planner was before the court.
Why use non-graphic artwork?
The visual system uses memorial, courthouse and case-file motifs instead of inventing portraits, recreating attacks or presenting illustrations as documentary evidence.
Tunisia archive FAQ
How many Tunisia cases are published?
Two verified case files are published: the separate assassinations of Chokri Belaid and Mohamed Brahmi.
Why are both cases classified as adjudicated?
Tunisian courts imposed convictions in both files. The labels remain bounded because sentences, appeals and alleged wider responsibility differ by defendant and proceeding.
Were death sentences carried out?
No execution in either case was located. Tunisia has maintained a de facto moratorium on executions since 1991.
Are the two assassinations duplicates?
No. They were separate killings of different victims on February 6 and July 25, 2013. Investigative links are documented without merging the incidents.