Five girls and women from the Genç family were murdered when their home was deliberately set on fire in a racist attack. Four perpetrators were convicted in 1995 of five murders, fourteen attempted murders and aggravated arson.
The Solingen arson attack became one of the defining racist crimes of post-war Germany. In the early hours of May 29, 1993, members of the Genç family were inside their home when it was deliberately set on fire. Five members of the family died and others were injured. The criminal case later established that the attack had an extreme-right and racist background.
The five people killed were Gürsün İnce, Hatice Genç, Hülya Genç, Saime Genç and Gülistan Öztürk. They were daughters, granddaughters and a niece within the extended Genç family. German federal commemorations have repeatedly centered the family rather than the perpetrators, particularly the public work of Mevlüde Genç, who lost five relatives and became associated with calls for reconciliation rather than revenge.
Official commemorative records also document that additional family members were injured, some severely. This page does not reproduce graphic medical details because they are not necessary to understand the crime or the judicial outcome.
The attack occurred during a period of intense racist and xenophobic violence in Germany after reunification. It followed other attacks on migrants and refugees and came only days after a major political change to asylum law. The timing is historically relevant, but a political decision should not be presented as a direct legal cause of the murders. The criminal responsibility belonged to the perpetrators convicted for setting the home on fire.
Four young men from the Solingen area, then between 16 and 23 years old, were arrested within days. German historical and federal sources describe them as having previously attracted attention for extreme-right or xenophobic views. The investigation led to a lengthy trial before the Higher Regional Court in Düsseldorf.
The evidentiary record was tested over 127 trial days. The court did not treat racist ideology as a vague background assumption: the judgment characterized the murders as committed for base, racist motives.
On October 13, 1995, the four defendants were convicted of five counts of murder, fourteen counts of attempted murder and particularly serious arson. Because of their ages, the sentencing framework included both adult and juvenile law. The punishments ranged from 10 to 15 years in prison or youth custody.
Later German public records note that the perpetrators ultimately completed those sentences. The fact that the sentences have been served does not alter the convictions or the historical classification of the attack as a racist multiple murder.
Solingen became a national reference point in debates about racist violence, protection of minorities and political responsibility. Federal commemorations in 2018 and 2023 again described the attack as a profound crime against the Genç family and against the principle that people should be able to live safely in Germany regardless of origin.
The case also illustrates why victim-centered reporting matters. The names and lives of those killed should not be displaced by the notoriety of the offenders. The public memory of Solingen has therefore increasingly emphasized the Genç family, the survivors and the broader social obligation to resist racist violence.
Five girls and women are killed and additional family members are injured.
Investigators identify four young men from the Solingen area.
The Higher Regional Court in Düsseldorf begins proceedings that will last 127 trial days.
All four defendants are convicted of five murders, fourteen attempted murders and aggravated arson, receiving sentences between 10 and 15 years.
German federal institutions mark the 25th and 30th anniversaries and again center the victims and the racist nature of the crime.
The case is solved and adjudicated. Four perpetrators were convicted and completed their sentences. There is no unresolved question about whether the five deaths were murders committed in the arson attack, although broader historical debates about the climate of racist violence and the state’s response continue.
This page attributes criminal responsibility only to those convicted. It does not generalize the offenders’ racist ideology to any broader population, and it separates historical context from legally established causation.
Last reviewed: August 26, 2026