Advertisement
Ad space reserved
Solved / AdjudicatedStalking / Revenge Murder
Sindang Station, Seoul · September 14, 2022

The Sindang Station Stalking Murder

A Seoul Metro employee was murdered at work by a former colleague who had stalked and threatened her while criminal proceedings were already underway. The case ended in a Supreme Court-confirmed life sentence and prompted renewed scrutiny of stalking protections and workplace access controls.

This case file discusses stalking, digital sexual abuse and murder. It protects the victim's identity, avoids graphic detail and distinguishes criminal guilt from later civil and institutional proceedings.
Editorial South Korea country artwork
Country artwork used as a non-graphic visual; it is not a reconstruction of the crime.

On September 14, 2022, a Seoul Metro employee was killed inside Sindang Station by former colleague Jeon Joo-hwan. By then, Jeon had already been prosecuted for stalking, threatening and illegally filming the same woman. The murder occurred one day before a court was due to sentence him in a stalking-related case.

Stalking before the murder

Jeon and the victim had worked for Seoul Metro. Prosecutors later described a prolonged pattern of stalking, threats and digital sexual abuse. The victim had reported him, and criminal proceedings were in progress before the killing.

This sequence is central to the case: the murder was not investigated as an isolated encounter. Prosecutors charged Jeon with retaliatory murder, arguing that the killing was connected to resentment over the victim's reports and the criminal case against him.

The killing at Sindang Station

The victim was working at Sindang Station on September 14, 2022 when Jeon attacked her in a women's restroom. Authorities did not publicly identify the victim by name, and this page follows that privacy practice.

Trial and sentencing

In February 2023, a Seoul court sentenced Jeon to 40 years in prison for the revenge murder. He had separately received a nine-year sentence on stalking, illegal-filming and threatening charges.

The cases were combined at the appellate stage. On July 11, 2023, the Seoul High Court imposed life imprisonment, ordered 15 years of electronic location monitoring after release if applicable, and required treatment programs addressing stalking and sexual violence.

Supreme Court decision

On October 12, 2023, South Korea's Supreme Court dismissed Jeon's appeal and finalized the life sentence. The court also left the electronic-monitoring and treatment orders in place.

The final judgment matters editorially because it removes any ambiguity about Jeon's criminal status. He is not merely a suspect or defendant; his life sentence is final.

Institutional aftermath

The murder led to scrutiny of stalking-law enforcement and workplace safety at Seoul Metro. Jeon had remained able to access internal systems while removed from active duties, and later civil litigation examined whether the operator had failed in its duty to protect the victim.

In July 2025, an appellate civil court ordered Seoul Metro to compensate the victim's parents, reversing an earlier first-instance loss. That civil ruling is separate from Jeon's criminal conviction and does not change the life sentence.

Timeline

  1. Stalking and criminal complaints

    The victim reports stalking, threats and illegal filming; Jeon is prosecuted.

  2. Murder at Sindang Station

    The victim is killed at her workplace one day before a scheduled stalking-case sentencing.

  3. First murder sentence

    A Seoul court imposes 40 years for retaliatory murder.

  4. Life sentence on appeal

    The Seoul High Court combines the related cases and imposes life imprisonment.

  5. Supreme Court finalizes sentence

    The Supreme Court dismisses the appeal and confirms life imprisonment.

Current status

The case is classified as Solved / Adjudicated. Jeon Joo-hwan's life sentence is final. Later civil litigation and policy debates concern institutional responsibility and victim protection, not whether Jeon was criminally convicted.

Victim privacy

South Korean authorities did not publicly identify the victim by name. This case file does not attempt to reverse that privacy choice.