Photographer Rubén Espinosa, activist Nadia Vera, Mile Virginia Martín, Yesenia Quiroz and Alejandra Negrete were murdered inside a Mexico City apartment. Three men were prosecuted as material participants, while the motive and possible involvement of additional people remained disputed and under investigation years later.

On July 31, 2015, five people were killed inside an apartment on Luz Saviñón Street in the Narvarte neighborhood of Mexico City: photojournalist Rubén Espinosa Becerril, activist Nadia Vera Pérez, Mile Virginia Martín, Yesenia Quiroz Alfaro and Alejandra Negrete Avilés. Espinosa and Vera had both previously lived in Veracruz and had publicly described intimidation or threats before relocating.
The murders immediately drew national attention because of the number of victims and because Espinosa was a journalist and Vera an activist. The case also became closely associated with questions about whether the crime was a robbery, a targeted attack, or involved motives connected to one or more of the victims. Those competing possibilities were never cleanly resolved in the public record.
Investigators arrested Abraham Torres Tranquilino, Daniel Pacheco Gutiérrez and César Omar Martínez Zendejas. Abraham Torres was sentenced in 2017 to 315 years of imprisonment for offenses that included aggravated feminicide, qualified homicide and aggravated robbery. Later reporting records a 270-year sentence against César Omar Martínez Zendejas.
The procedural history of Daniel Pacheco requires particular caution. Mexico City prosecutors said in August 2025 that convictions had been obtained against the three men they described as material authors. However, other 2025 reporting on the tenth anniversary of the case stated that Pacheco's earlier sentence had been annulled in 2023 for due-process violations and that a new trial was underway. Because those accounts do not establish a final later judgment resolving that retrial, this page does not treat Pacheco's position as finally settled.
The existence of prosecutions did not answer every question. In 2022 and 2023, independent work by the victims' families and their representatives pointed to evidence they said suggested additional people may have been involved. Reporting described another vehicle and telephone-location evidence that, according to those investigators, did not fit the original three-person theory.
On the tenth anniversary in 2025, the Mexico City Attorney General's Office said it continued parallel investigative work and was exploring hypotheses concerning participation by other people. Families and press-freedom advocates continued to argue that important lines of inquiry had not been exhausted.
No reliable source located for this review established a final judicial finding identifying an intellectual author or conclusively proving why the five victims were targeted. The fact that Espinosa and Vera had reported threats in Veracruz is part of the documented context, but it is not equivalent to a court finding that any specific official, criminal organization or political actor ordered the murders.
For that reason, this case is classified as Partially Adjudicated: material-participant prosecutions produced major convictions, but at least one defendant's procedural posture remained contested in later reporting, and the wider questions of motive, possible additional participants and intellectual responsibility were still unresolved.
Last reviewed: August 30, 2026