Switzerland · Homicide / Criminal-Justice Review

The Murder of Marie

In May 2013, a 19-year-old woman publicly identified as Marie was abducted from Payerne and murdered by Claude D., who had already been convicted of an earlier murder and was serving the remainder of that sentence under electronic monitoring.

Editorial Switzerland case-file cover for the murder of Marie
Editorial note: Swiss court records and news coverage generally identify the victim in this case only as “Marie.” Crime by Region follows that privacy-conscious convention and avoids unnecessary graphic detail.

Abduction and murder

According to Switzerland's Federal Supreme Court, Claude D. had been in contact with Marie from March 2013. On May 13, he went to her workplace in Payerne, canton Vaud, and forced her into his car. During the night of May 13–14, 2013, he killed her in a forest near Châtonnaye in canton Fribourg. He was arrested shortly afterward.

Why the case caused an institutional crisis

Claude D. had been sentenced in 2000 to 20 years in prison for an earlier murder and other offenses. By 2012 he had moved into a conditional-release regime, and in 2013 he was under electronic monitoring. Marie's murder therefore prompted intense scrutiny of risk assessment, supervised release and the exchange of information among Swiss justice, corrections and medical authorities.

Conviction and life sentence

In 2016, the Broye and North Vaud Criminal Court convicted Claude D. of murder, false imprisonment and abduction, sexual coercion and other offenses. It imposed life imprisonment and lifelong preventive detention. In February 2018, the Federal Supreme Court confirmed the murder conviction and life sentence but annulled the lifelong-detention measure because the statutory requirement for two independent experts to find the offender permanently untreatable had not been met.

Preventive detention after appeal

On remand, Vaud's cantonal court imposed ordinary preventive detention in addition to the life sentence. In February 2019, the Federal Supreme Court upheld that measure, making the sanction final. In March 2026, a district court in Yverdon rejected Claude D.'s request for conditional release and for a change in his detention regime; his lawyer announced an appeal.

Advertisement

Sources and further reading

Case context

The case became a national reference point for the limits of supervised release and for the legal distinction between lifelong and ordinary preventive detention. The final murder conviction and life sentence were not overturned when the detention measure was reconsidered.