Twelve-year-old Lynne Harper was murdered near Clinton, Ontario, in 1959. Her 14-year-old classmate Steven Truscott was convicted and sentenced to death, but nearly five decades later the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that the conviction was a miscarriage of justice and entered an acquittal. Lynne’s killer was not identified by that ruling.

On the evening of June 9, 1959, 12-year-old Lynne Harper disappeared near the Royal Canadian Air Force station outside Clinton in southwestern Ontario. Two days later, a search party found her body in a wooded area known as Lawson’s Bush. Her 14-year-old classmate Steven Truscott had been seen giving her a bicycle ride earlier that evening and quickly became the focus of the investigation.
Lynne Harper was 12 years old and lived with her family near RCAF Station Clinton. The Ontario Court of Appeal’s 2007 judgment records that she was reported missing close to midnight on June 9 and that her body was discovered on June 11. The court found that she had been sexually assaulted and strangled.
The legal history that followed became nationally famous, but this file does not reduce Lynne to the wrongful-conviction controversy. She was the victim of a homicide whose true perpetrator was not established by the later acquittal.
Between about 7:00 and 7:30 p.m. on June 9, witnesses saw Lynne riding with Steven Truscott on his bicycle along the County Road. Truscott consistently maintained that he left her unharmed near the intersection with Highway 8 and later saw her near a vehicle. The prosecution’s 1959 theory was different: it argued that Truscott had taken Lynne into Lawson’s Bush and killed her during a narrow time window.
A central part of that theory was medical evidence estimating Lynne’s time of death. That estimate was treated as placing the killing within the period in which Truscott had been with her. Truscott was charged on June 13, 1959.
Although he was 14, Truscott was ordered to stand trial as an adult. His trial began in September 1959 in Goderich, Ontario. The Crown relied on circumstantial evidence, including the original medical estimate of the time of death and witness evidence about Truscott and Lynne’s movements.
On September 30, 1959, the jury convicted Truscott of murder. Under the law then in force, the trial judge imposed a mandatory sentence of death by hanging. The sentence was later commuted to life imprisonment.
Truscott’s early appeals failed. The Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal in January 1960, and the Supreme Court of Canada refused leave the following month. A 1967 Supreme Court reference also left the conviction standing, although Justice Emmett Hall dissented.
Truscott spent about 10 years in custody. He was released on parole in October 1969, and the Ontario Court of Appeal later recorded that his parole restrictions ended in 1974. He continued to maintain his innocence.
The case remained controversial for decades, especially because the prosecution’s narrow time-of-death theory depended heavily on forensic assumptions that later came under serious scrutiny. In 2001, Truscott sought ministerial review of the conviction. The federal Minister of Justice eventually referred the matter to the Ontario Court of Appeal for consideration as an appeal based on fresh evidence.
The 2007 appeal involved an extensive new record, including modern forensic pathology and other expert evidence. The court concluded that the fresh evidence significantly undermined the reliability of the original time-of-death evidence that had been central to the prosecution’s theory of near-exclusive opportunity.
The court did not say that every historical question had been answered. It did, however, conclude that the conviction could no longer stand. In Truscott (Re), 2007 ONCA 575, a five-judge panel found that the conviction was a miscarriage of justice.
On August 28, 2007, the Ontario Court of Appeal quashed Truscott’s conviction and entered an acquittal. The court explained that, on the full evidentiary record including the fresh evidence, an acquittal would clearly be the likely result if a new trial were possible.
The court also declined Truscott’s request for a separate declaration of factual innocence. That distinction is important. The legal result is an acquittal and a formally overturned wrongful conviction; the judgment did not identify Lynne Harper’s killer.
On July 7, 2008, the Government of Ontario announced that Truscott would receive C$6.5 million in compensation. The province said the payment followed independent advice from former Ontario Court of Appeal judge Sydney Robins and acknowledged the exceptional circumstances of the case.
The government’s statement also emphasized Lynne Harper’s family and the continuing tragedy of her death. Compensation to Truscott addressed the miscarriage of justice; it did not resolve Lynne’s homicide.
The criminal judgment against Steven Truscott no longer stands. He is legally acquitted. The remaining unresolved question is the identity of the person who killed Lynne Harper.
This archive therefore classifies the case as unsolved / wrongful conviction corrected. Calling it “solved” would incorrectly imply that a valid conviction or identified perpetrator remains in place. Calling Truscott merely a “suspect” without the acquittal would be equally misleading.
Lynne Harper is last seen alive near RCAF Station Clinton after riding on Steven Truscott’s bicycle.
A search party finds her body in Lawson’s Bush.
Police charge 14-year-old Steven Truscott with Lynne’s murder.
A jury convicts Truscott. The mandatory sentence is death by hanging.
The sentence is commuted to life imprisonment after his Ontario appeal fails.
Truscott leaves prison after roughly a decade in custody.
The federal Minister of Justice refers the conviction to the Ontario Court of Appeal after the miscarriage-of-justice review process.
The Ontario Court of Appeal rules the conviction a miscarriage of justice and enters an acquittal.
The province announces C$6.5 million in compensation to Truscott.
Unsolved murder; wrongful conviction corrected. Steven Truscott stands acquitted. No other person is identified in the final 2007 judgment as Lynne Harper’s killer, and this page does not infer guilt against any uncharged individual.
An acquittal after a miscarriage of justice is not the same thing as solving the underlying homicide. This file therefore separates two outcomes: Truscott’s conviction was overturned, while Lynne Harper’s murder remains without a valid conviction.
Last reviewed: September 2, 2026