An illicit market for information about ambulance patients' deaths exposed something far darker in Łódź: two former ambulance attendants were convicted over the murders of five patients. Two former doctors were also convicted in the same major trial, but for endangering patients and related conduct—not for murder.
The Polish phrase łowcy skór, usually translated as “skin hunters,” became shorthand for a scandal that emerged from the Łódź emergency medical service. Funeral businesses paid for information about deaths, creating a corrupt financial incentive around dying patients. The criminal case eventually established that two ambulance attendants had gone further and murdered patients.
The scandal became public in January 2002 after Polish journalists reported that ambulance personnel in Łódź had been selling information about patient deaths to funeral homes. The payments were tied to funeral companies gaining early access to bereaved families and winning funeral business.
Later prosecutions established multiple layers of misconduct. Some healthcare workers were charged with accepting money or helping defraud families. The most serious case, however, concerned allegations that patients had actually been killed by ambulance personnel.
In the principal criminal trial, former ambulance attendants Andrzej Nowocień and Karol Banaś were convicted in connection with the murders of a total of five patients. Court reporting described the use of a muscle-relaxant medication that was administered without medical justification. This page does not reproduce detailed physiological descriptions because they are unnecessary to understand the convictions.
The first-instance judgment in January 2007 sentenced Nowocień to life imprisonment and Banaś to 25 years. Reporting on the judgment stated that Nowocień was convicted of four murders and participation in a fifth, while Banaś was convicted of one murder and participation in four others.
Two former ambulance doctors, reported in court coverage as Janusz K. and Paweł W., were tried alongside the attendants. Their legal responsibility was different. They were convicted for exposing or endangering the lives of 14 patients who later died, as well as related misconduct; they were not convicted of murdering those 14 patients.
The doctors received six-year and five-year prison terms, respectively, along with long professional bans. This distinction is essential. A headline that calls all four defendants serial killers would overstate the court record and erase the different offenses actually adjudicated.
On June 9, 2008, the Łódź Court of Appeal upheld the main sentences: life imprisonment for Nowocień, 25 years for Banaś, and six and five years for the two doctors. Contemporary reporting described that appellate judgment as legally binding, while the defense still pursued cassation to the Supreme Court.
On October 27, 2009, Poland's Supreme Court rejected cassation challenges concerning Nowocień, Banaś and one of the doctors. TVN24 and Rzeczpospolita reported that the life sentence, 25-year sentence and six-year sentence were final. The murder convictions therefore meet this archive's standard for Solved / Adjudicated.
The murder trial was not the only prosecution arising from the affair. Separate proceedings dealt with ambulance workers who took payments from funeral companies in exchange for information about deaths. Some of those cases involved fraud and corruption rather than homicide.
That broader history should not be collapsed into the five proven murders. The scandal revealed an unethical commercial system around death notifications; the murder convictions were a distinct and more serious subset established against two attendants.
Authorities continued investigating other possible patient deaths and possible criminal conduct after the main convictions. In 2013, TVN24 reported that prosecutors had discontinued the final remaining strand of the long investigation because the evidence did not support additional homicide charges.
The same report summarized the final murder outcome: Nowocień and Banaś remained convicted over five patient killings, while the two doctors' convictions concerned endangerment of patients rather than murder. Closing additional investigative strands without charges does not expand the number of proven victims, so this page uses the five murders established in court rather than larger speculative totals.
The phrase “skin hunters” is memorable, but it risks making the offenders or the scandal's nickname more prominent than the patients who were betrayed in a setting where they should have received emergency care. Many court reports anonymized the victims, and this archive does not attempt to fill those gaps from weaker sources.
The central human fact is enough: patients entrusted to emergency medical personnel were deliberately killed by two attendants, while a corrupt referral system monetized information about death around them.
Investigators later document payments from funeral businesses to ambulance workers for information about patient deaths.
Polish reporting publicly reveals the Łódź ambulance “skin hunters” affair and allegations that some patients may have been deliberately killed.
Nowocień receives life imprisonment and Banaś 25 years for murder-related offenses involving five patients. Two doctors receive six- and five-year terms on different offenses.
The Łódź Court of Appeal upholds the sentences.
The Supreme Court leaves the principal life, 25-year and six-year sentences in place, confirming their final status.
Prosecutors close the remaining inquiry without establishing additional murders beyond those already adjudicated.
The Łódź ambulance “Skin Hunters” murder case is classified Solved / Adjudicated. Two former attendants were finally convicted over five patient murders. The doctors' separate convictions remain described according to the offenses actually established against them, and unproven suspicions about additional deaths are not counted as murders.
Contemporary coverage sometimes uses the “Skin Hunters” label for everyone involved in the broader scandal. This page uses it only as the recognized case name and keeps the legal roles separate. It does not state that the convicted doctors murdered patients, because that was not their conviction.
Last reviewed: August 29, 2026