Advertisement
Ad space reserved
Solved / AdjudicatedMurder / Contract Killing / Family Crime
Min Buri, Bangkok, Thailand · October 19, 2013

The Murder of Jakkrit Panichpatikum

Jakkrit Panichpatikum, a prominent Thai competitive shooter, was killed in a drive-by shooting in Bangkok in 2013. The legal story changed dramatically between trial and appeal: his widow was first convicted, then acquitted, while her mother was ultimately held responsible for arranging the killing.

This file concerns a fatal shooting and allegations of domestic abuse raised in court. It avoids graphic detail and distinguishes the trial verdict from the later appellate findings.
Thailand editorial artwork for the Jakkrit Panichpatikum murder case
Country-based editorial artwork; it does not depict the victim, defendants or crime scene.

Jakkrit Panichpatikum, 40, was a member of Thailand's national shooting team and had competed internationally. On October 19, 2013, he was shot while driving in Bangkok's Min Buri district. The homicide investigation soon focused on a contract-killing theory involving members of his extended family and intermediaries.

The shooting

Jakkrit was driving near Ramkhamhaeng Soi 166 when two men on a motorcycle approached his vehicle. He was fatally shot. Police later identified Jeerasak Klinkhai as the gunman and Tawatchai Phetchote as the man who tracked Jakkrit and relayed his location.

The prosecution also alleged that lawyer Santi Thongsem helped arrange the hired killing. The more difficult question was who had ordered it.

Early investigation and competing accounts

Jakkrit's wife, Dr Nithiwadee “Mor Nim” Phucharoenyos, denied ordering the killing. Her mother, Surang Duangchinda, told investigators that she had independently arranged the contract because she believed her daughter had suffered repeated abuse from Jakkrit.

Those abuse allegations became relevant to the courts' discussion of motive and mitigation. They are reported here as claims and findings considered in the criminal proceedings, not as an independent adjudication of every alleged incident within the marriage.

The 2016 trial verdict

In December 2016, the Min Buri court reached an outcome that later proved not to be final. It convicted Nithiwadee and Santi of involvement in the murder conspiracy and sentenced both to death. Jeerasak and Tawatchai were also convicted; their death sentences were reduced to life imprisonment after the court credited information they had provided.

At that stage, Surang was acquitted. The trial court found insufficient evidence to rely on her claim that she had ordered the killing, despite her own statements.

The Appeal Court reverses the central finding

On August 7, 2018, the Appeal Court substantially changed the case. It acquitted Nithiwadee, concluding that the evidence did not prove she had arranged her husband's murder. The court instead accepted Surang's earlier confession and found that Surang had masterminded the contract killing.

Surang received a death sentence that was reduced to life imprisonment. Santi's death sentence remained in place, while the life sentences for Jeerasak and Tawatchai were upheld.

This reversal is central to an accurate account of the case. Nithiwadee cannot be described as a convicted mastermind merely because she was convicted at first instance; that conviction was overturned.

Supreme Court final ruling

The Supreme Court later agreed with the Appeal Court's essential findings. Its ruling, read at Min Buri Court on May 24, 2021 and publicly reported in October that year, upheld Nithiwadee's acquittal and the guilty findings against Surang, Santi, Jeerasak and Tawatchai.

The Supreme Court reduced Surang's life sentence to 25 years, citing her age, lack of prior record, cooperation and the circumstances the court accepted as contributing to her decision. It left Santi's death sentence and the life sentences of Jeerasak and Tawatchai unchanged. Santi was reported as remaining at large at the time of the final ruling.

What the courts established

The final judicial outcome established a contract-killing chain in which Surang was found to have ordered the murder, Santi to have helped arrange it, Jeerasak to have carried out the shooting and Tawatchai to have assisted by tracking the victim. The final judgment also established that the evidence was insufficient to convict Nithiwadee.

The case therefore demonstrates why appellate status matters in true-crime reporting. The first trial's narrative was not the final legal conclusion.

Timeline

  1. Jakkrit is killed

    He is fatally shot while driving in Bangkok's Min Buri district.

  2. Contract-killing investigation develops

    Police arrest or question suspects, while Surang says she arranged the killing and Nithiwadee denies involvement.

  3. Trial convictions

    The first court convicts Nithiwadee, Santi, Jeerasak and Tawatchai, while acquitting Surang.

  4. Appeal Court reverses key findings

    Nithiwadee is acquitted. Surang is convicted as the person who ordered the killing.

  5. Supreme Court ruling

    The top court upholds the acquittal and core guilty findings, reducing Surang's punishment to 25 years.

  6. Final ruling publicly reported

    Thai media report the Supreme Court's final disposition of the long-running case.

Current status

Solved / adjudicated. The Supreme Court brought the principal murder case to a final judicial conclusion. Surang Duangchinda, Santi Thongsem, Jeerasak Klinkhai and Tawatchai Phetchote remained convicted in the roles established by the appellate courts; Nithiwadee Phucharoenyos was acquitted.

Editorial distinction

A trial conviction that is overturned on appeal is not a final conviction. This file therefore identifies Nithiwadee as an acquitted defendant and does not repeat the first court's theory as though it remained legally established.