Romanian lawyer Elodia Ghinescu vanished in 2007 and was never found. Her husband, former police officer Cristian Cioacă, denied killing her, but a final 2014 judgment convicted him of causing her death and concealing the body.
Elodia Ghinescu, a lawyer from Brașov, disappeared at the end of August 2007. No body was recovered despite one of Romania's most extensive missing-person and criminal investigations. Years later, a court concluded that her husband, Cristian Cioacă, was criminally responsible for her death.
Ghinescu disappeared during the night of August 29 to 30, 2007. Cioacă, then a police officer, did not admit killing her and continued to maintain his innocence. Authorities searched widely, but her remains were never found.
The absence of a body made the case unusually difficult. Investigators relied on physical evidence, the couple's circumstances and other circumstantial material rather than a conventional crime-scene reconstruction built around recovered remains.
Prosecutors eventually alleged that a conflict between the spouses escalated in their home and that Cioacă caused Ghinescu's death before disposing of her body. That account was an allegation during the investigation and trial; this archive does not treat the indictment itself as proof.
Ghinescu was later legally declared dead. The declaration addressed her civil status and did not by itself prove who caused her death.
At first instance, the Argeș Tribunal imposed a 22-year prison sentence. That was not the final outcome. The case went to the Pitești Court of Appeal, which reconsidered both the legal classification and sentence.
On June 18, 2014, the appellate court changed the principal offense from murder to lovituri cauzatoare de moarte — blows causing death — and also convicted Cioacă of desecration of a corpse. The resulting effective sentence was 15 years and eight months. Contemporary reporting described the ruling as final.
It would be inaccurate to say that the final Romanian judgment convicted Cioacă of the offense legally classified as murder. The appeal court expressly changed that classification. Crime by Region therefore describes the case as a bodyless death conviction and identifies the precise final offenses rather than simplifying the judgment into a different charge.
The same distinction applies to Cioacă's continued denial. His denial is a documented fact, but it does not erase the final conviction; conversely, the conviction does not justify inventing a location for Ghinescu's remains or details that investigators never established.
In August 2023, the Argeș Tribunal granted Cioacă conditional release. The decision was final and he was released after serving part of the sentence. Conditional release altered how the sentence was being served; it did not overturn the 2014 conviction or amount to an acquittal.
Elodia Ghinescu's remains have never been recovered in the public record relied on for this file. That leaves an enduring factual question for her family even though criminal responsibility reached a final legal judgment.
This is why the case can be legally adjudicated while still containing a major unresolved element. The archive's status describes the criminal proceeding, not a claim that every factual question has been answered.
The Brașov lawyer vanishes. Her body is never recovered.
Authorities conduct an extensive inquiry and the case moves from disappearance to a criminal prosecution.
The Argeș Tribunal imposes a sentence that is later reviewed on appeal.
The Pitești Court of Appeal changes the legal classification to blows causing death, also convicts Cioacă of desecration of a corpse, and imposes an effective 15-year-and-eight-month term.
The Argeș Tribunal grants Cioacă conditional release in a final decision.
Solved / Adjudicated. Cristian Cioacă's final 2014 conviction remains the operative criminal outcome cited in current reporting. He was conditionally released in 2023. Elodia Ghinescu's remains have not been found.
A bodyless conviction requires especially careful wording. This page does not equate disappearance with proof, does not call conditional release an acquittal and does not replace the appellate court's final offense classification with the original murder charge.
Last reviewed: September 1, 2026