Solved case · robbery, arson and multiple homicide · adjudicated

The Campus Trendz Firebombing Case

On 3 September 2010, two armed men entered the Campus Trendz clothing store on Tudor Street in Bridgetown during a robbery. One threw two petrol bombs; six women sheltering inside died from smoke inhalation. Renaldo Alleyne later pleaded guilty to six manslaughter counts, while Jamar Bynoe was convicted of six murders. Both received life sentences through separate proceedings.

Date3 September 2010
LocationBridgetown, Barbados
VictimsSix women
StatusSolved / adjudicated
Symbolic memorial artwork for the Campus Trendz firebombing case

Editorial illustration. No real person or crime scene is depicted.

Advertisement
Direct answer

What is the Campus Trendz case?

The Campus Trendz case concerns a fatal robbery and firebombing at a clothing store in central Bridgetown. The Caribbean Court of Justice's 2019 judgment records that Alleyne and another armed man entered intending to rob the store. Alleyne threw two petrol bombs. Six women in a bathroom or storeroom died from smoke inhalation—five at the scene and one later in hospital.

The case is classified as solved because it produced standing adjudicated outcomes. Alleyne's manslaughter pleas led to six concurrent life sentences and a 25-year minimum term after appeal. Bynoe's murder convictions were upheld; after the mandatory death sentence was vacated, he was resentenced to six life terms with a reported minimum of 55 years.

People remembered

The six women who died

The official Caribbean Court of Justice judgment records the victims as Shana Griffith, Kelly-Ann Welch, Pearl Amanda Cornelius, Kellishaw Kamar Ollivierre, Nikkita Dionne Samantha Belgrave and Tiffany Harding. This archive follows those spellings and avoids reducing the women to evidence in a court history.

Contemporary reporting described the deaths as a national tragedy. Later Barbados government commemorations have continued to treat 3 September as a moment for remembrance and reflection on violent crime.

3 September 2010

The robbery and fire

According to the CCJ record, two armed men entered Campus Trendz at about 7 p.m. with the intention of committing robbery. One was Alleyne. During the crime, he threw two Molotov cocktails into the store. The fire and smoke spread while staff and customers sought shelter.

The six women died from smoke inhalation. Five died at the scene; the sixth was taken to hospital and later died. This account uses the court's findings and does not add unverified descriptions of the interior, the victims' final moments or the attackers' private motives.

Evidence boundary: The authoritative record establishes a robbery, the use of petrol bombs and the resulting deaths. It does not justify invented dialogue, reconstructed thoughts or graphic embellishment.
Investigation

Eyewitness evidence and admissions

Police developed eyewitness evidence connecting Alleyne to the attack. The CCJ judgment also records that he admitted participating in the robbery and throwing the petrol bombs. Those facts became central to his later guilty pleas.

Bynoe's case followed a separate trial path. The legal record must therefore be read defendant by defendant: an admission and plea by one person cannot automatically be transferred to another, and a murder verdict is not interchangeable with a manslaughter plea.

Alleyne proceedings

Manslaughter pleas and appellate sentence

On 1 June 2011, Alleyne pleaded guilty to six counts of manslaughter, pleas the prosecution accepted. On 15 August 2012, the High Court imposed six concurrent life sentences. The sentence history then moved through the appellate courts.

In May 2019, the Caribbean Court of Justice dismissed Alleyne's appeal. The CCJ concluded that life imprisonment was appropriate and directed that he serve at least 25 years before becoming eligible for release, with credit governed by the court's order. The decision did not transform his manslaughter pleas into murder convictions.

Advertisement
Bynoe proceedings

Murder convictions, appeal and resentencing

A jury convicted Jamar Dwayne Bynoe in 2016 of six counts of murder. In June 2022, Barbados' Court of Appeal upheld those convictions but vacated the mandatory death sentence and sent the matter back to the High Court for resentencing. The change concerned punishment, not the guilty verdicts.

Later that year, the Caribbean Court of Justice refused Bynoe special leave to appeal the convictions. Local reporting on the High Court's October 2024 decision states that he received six life sentences and must serve a minimum of 55 years after deductions for time already spent on remand and for delay.

Why the distinction matters: Bynoe's six murder convictions remained standing even though the original death sentence did not. A successful sentence challenge is not an acquittal.
Appellate meaning

What changed—and what did not

The 2022 appellate ruling separated conviction from sentence. It preserved the jury's guilty verdicts but removed a mandatory capital sentence that could no longer stand under the applicable constitutional and judicial framework. The High Court then had to impose a lawful replacement sentence.

For readers checking current status, the operative picture is therefore: standing murder convictions for Bynoe, standing manslaughter pleas for Alleyne, and life sentences for both men under distinct orders and minimum terms.

Classification

Why Crime by Region lists the case as solved

The archive uses “solved / adjudicated” when supported judicial outcomes identify criminal responsibility and remain in force. Alleyne's accepted guilty pleas and Bynoe's upheld jury convictions meet that standard. The label does not imply that the two men were convicted of the same offences or received identical sentences.

A fresh review through found no later published ruling that displaced those outcomes. That is an editorial status check, not a claim that no administrative or custodial development could ever exist outside the reviewed public record.

Public memory

National impact and commemoration

The deaths prompted grief across Barbados and renewed attention to public safety, violence and emergency preparedness. Government remembrance initiatives have invoked the Campus Trendz victims in broader days of reflection for people lost to violent crime.

This page does not claim that a single case caused every later policy or fire-safety measure. It records only the enduring public significance supported by official commemoration and contemporary reporting.

Case timeline

Key verified dates

Two armed men rob Campus Trendz in Bridgetown; petrol bombs are thrown, and six women die from smoke inhalation.

Renaldo Alleyne pleads guilty to six counts of manslaughter.

Alleyne receives six concurrent life sentences.

A jury convicts Jamar Bynoe of six murders.

The CCJ dismisses Alleyne's appeal and directs a minimum term of 25 years.

The Court of Appeal upholds Bynoe's convictions, vacates the death sentence and orders resentencing.

The CCJ refuses Bynoe special leave to appeal the convictions.

The High Court imposes six life sentences on Bynoe, with a reported minimum term of 55 years after deductions.

The archive checks the available record and retains the solved / adjudicated classification.

Frequently asked questions

Questions about the Campus Trendz case

When did the Campus Trendz firebombing happen?

The robbery and firebombing happened on the evening of 3 September 2010 at the Campus Trendz clothing store on Tudor Street in Bridgetown, Barbados.

Who died in the Campus Trendz fire?

The Caribbean Court of Justice judgment records the victims as Shana Griffith, Kelly-Ann Welch, Pearl Amanda Cornelius, Kellishaw Kamar Ollivierre, Nikkita Dionne Samantha Belgrave and Tiffany Harding.

What happened to Renaldo Alleyne?

Alleyne pleaded guilty on 1 June 2011 to six counts of manslaughter and later received six concurrent life sentences. In 2019, the Caribbean Court of Justice dismissed his sentencing appeal and directed a minimum term of 25 years.

What happened to Jamar Bynoe?

Bynoe was convicted in 2016 of six murders. Barbados' Court of Appeal upheld the convictions in 2022 but vacated the mandatory death sentence. After resentencing, local reporting recorded six life sentences and a minimum term of 55 years.

Why is this case classified as solved?

The case has standing adjudicated outcomes: Alleyne's manslaughter pleas and Bynoe's murder convictions, followed by life sentences. The classification reflects those court outcomes rather than an arrest or allegation.

Did both defendants receive the same conviction?

No. Alleyne pleaded guilty to manslaughter, while Bynoe was convicted of murder. The archive preserves that legal distinction throughout.

What was the verified status on 27 October 2026?

The reviewed judicial and news record showed the convictions and life sentences standing. No later ruling changing those outcomes was located in the sources checked through 27 October 2026.

Sources and editorial notes

Records used for this case file

Primary judicial records lead this chronology. Later local reporting is used for procedural events after the 2019 CCJ judgment. Where a report republishes another newsroom's work, that relationship is identified rather than obscured.

Caribbean Court of Justice, Alleyne v The Queen [2019] CCJ 06 (AJ) — authoritative account of the offence, victims, plea, initial sentence and 2019 appeal.

Caribbean Court of Justice media release, 2 May 2019 — outcome and 25-year minimum term.

CBC Barbados, 7 June 2022 — Bynoe's convictions upheld, death sentence vacated and resentencing ordered.

Barbados Today, 26 November 2022 — CCJ refusal of special leave to appeal Bynoe's convictions.

Bajan Beacon republication of Nation News, 25 October 2024 — Bynoe's six life sentences, minimum term and deductions.

Barbados Government Information Service, Day of Reflection — official commemoration context.

Stabroek News, 12 September 2010 — contemporary regional remembrance of the victims.

Editorial status note: Sources were reviewed through 27 October 2026. “Solved” refers to standing adjudicated outcomes; it does not merge charges, pleas, verdicts or sentences. The illustration is symbolic and no graphic material is used.

← Back to the Barbados archive